It is not in Foucault that these constraints are felt painfully, but in
Hegel and in Adorno; Adorno whose thinking is often so close to Foucault’s,
and who often went so much further.
Through those elements of meaning where it must ‘point beyond itself’2
does art verify the necessity for an Aesthetics to explain it- a tourniquet
for the bleeding arteries of its drained relation to the spirit and communication
of which ordinary men are capable. That premise is everywhere in Hegel’s
various lectures on aesthetics, and Adorno’s Aesthetic
Theory is inconceivable without it. The dialectics of incompletion
transmits the artwork into a purgatory of waiting, parasitically dependant
upon the thought that purposively embodies it. Adorno, in the section
on ‘The Ugly, The Beautiful and Technique’ speaks of the concept
that cannot be completed, and the aporia that philosophy fills:
‘Art cannot fulfil its concept. This strikes
each and every one of its works, even the highest, with an ineluctable
imperfectness that repudiates the idea of perfection toward which artworks
must aspire. Unreflected, perfectly logical enlightenment would have
to discard art just as the prosaic pragmatist in fact does. The aporia
of art, pulled between regression to literal magic or surrender of the
mimetic impulse to thinglike rationality, dictates its law of motion;
the aporia cannot be eliminated.’3
The Triumph of Death gives up its rights of
passage, and that means quite simply that it gives up our rights and capabilities
of thinking it, and thus enabling its completion, as situated between
and dialectically produced by magic and mimesis. The difference between
our inability to step into its localised space, without the projected
foreground that encages us as does Las Meninas,
as representation itself should do, and the human figures being slain
within the picture, who have no horizon line over which to flee, is beyond
that compound of the myth behind us and the representation in front. Exactly:
it is that graduated series of steps that is discarded - from magic to
mimesis to the new magic engendered by the modern world’s catastrophe;
from, in Foucault’s terms, the hierarchy of sacred to profane that
leads down through man from god above to Lucifer below, man and his replicants
passed through somewhere in between. Giving up the rights of passage means
that we have no right to say that we’re like the figures on Breughel’s
violent surface, or that they’re like us, and that only the truth
that there’s no way in and no way out can be enforced as the meaning
of The Triumph of Death.
::
interactive :: <<back next>>
|
|